Farm Subsidy information
Brule County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Brule County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,245
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $279,882,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $4,118,598 |
| 2 | Pazour Family Feeders | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $1,846,331 |
| 3 | Foxley Brothers | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,832,458 |
| 4 | Olson Land & Livestock Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,637,984 |
| 5 | Roger Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $1,611,860 |
| 6 | Timothy J Pazour | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $1,515,346 |
| 7 | Robert F Surat Sr | Academy, SD 57369 | $1,499,742 |
| 8 | Kroupa Ranch LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $1,438,143 |
| 9 | Rose L7 Ranch Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $1,391,439 |
| 10 | Steven Mairose | Kimball, SD 57355 | $1,275,832 |
| 11 | Edward Havlik | Kimball, SD 57355 | $1,245,771 |
| 12 | Kroupa Pukwana Cattle LLC | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $1,244,659 |
| 13 | Grass Ranch Hutt Breth Inc | Kimball, SD 57355 | $1,227,707 |
| 14 | Olsen Farms Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,226,279 |
| 15 | William Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $1,207,560 |
| 16 | Thompson Hereford Ranch Inc | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $1,203,915 |
| 17 | Thiry Feedlot Inc | White Lake, SD 57383 | $1,150,991 |
| 18 | Christensen Grain Farm Partnership | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $1,146,121 |
| 19 | Nepodal & Sons Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,133,254 |
| 20 | David Pazour | Kimball, SD 57355 | $1,053,926 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf