Farm Subsidy information
Butte County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Butte County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,646
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butte County, South Dakota totaled $123,272,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gene Johnny Johnson | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,792,174 |
2 | Joe W Burke | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,493,812 |
3 | Arledge Livestock Company LLC | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $1,379,800 |
4 | Orwick Ranch Llp | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,323,878 |
5 | Bruce G Crago | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,138,933 |
6 | Robert S Boylan | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,132,058 |
7 | Ingodwe Perpetual Trust | Spearfish, SD 57783 | $1,106,048 |
8 | Todd W Goeringer | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,077,012 |
9 | Patrick J Burke | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,057,318 |
10 | Steven J Gatzke | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,023,671 |
11 | Gary L Nelson | Newell, SD 57760 | $1,023,429 |
12 | Kudlock Ranch LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $952,695 |
13 | Daniel S Long | Waynesboro, PA 17268 | $920,293 |
14 | Gotfredson Elm Creek Ranch | Newell, SD 57760 | $896,667 |
15 | Harold Miller | Newell, SD 57760 | $894,875 |
16 | Wittler Joint Venture | Onida, SD 57564 | $861,483 |
17 | John Orwick | Newell, SD 57760 | $857,377 |
18 | Ralph Crago | Saint Onge, SD 57779 | $815,715 |
19 | Steele Ranch Inc | Nisland, SD 57762 | $807,314 |
20 | Sd Building Authority | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $803,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>