Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 613

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $11,526,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2021
21Mhc Land And Cattle Ltd Dba Christiansen Land & CKimball, SD 57355$99,722
22Feiok Farms LLCPlatte, SD 57369$96,467
23Joseph Jay KokesDelmont, SD 57330$94,446
24Christine HamiltonKimball, SD 57355$92,151
25Ronald Dean EricksonPlatte, SD 57369$88,174
26CuzPlatte, SD 57369$87,912
27Roger L SoukupLake Andes, SD 57356$84,430
28Gary & Phyllis Hrdlicka Living TrustArmour, SD 57313$83,314
29Larry L LaskaLake Andes, SD 57356$82,343
30Eugene John & Barbara Slaba Living TrustWagner, SD 57380$82,335
31Vernon Jay VanvuurenPlatte, SD 57369$81,864
32Richard SoulekArmour, SD 57313$78,887
33Randy L EricksonPlatte, SD 57369$78,749
34Mark Gant Farms IncGeddes, SD 57342$75,306
35Vanderpol Farm PartnershipPlatte, SD 57369$71,764
36Donald G WiechmannWagner, SD 57380$71,562
37David Lee DufrainGeddes, SD 57342$68,902
38Steve Eugene EricksonPlatte, SD 57369$68,643
39Daniel SoulekArmour, SD 57313$68,581
40Gregory G MathisWagner, SD 57380$67,418

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag