Farm Subsidy information
Hamlin County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,708
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $294,359,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Edward Holzwarth | Hazel, SD 57242 | $1,267,057 |
22 | Leonard Edward Kopman | Bryant, SD 57221 | $1,259,810 |
23 | Stephany Kay Kopman | Bryant, SD 57221 | $1,220,182 |
24 | Ronald Francis Thyen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $1,133,828 |
25 | Milton A Lakness | Hayti, SD 57241 | $1,131,631 |
26 | Gary D Wiseman | Bryant, SD 57221 | $1,097,217 |
27 | Sunflower Farms Inc | Hayti, SD 57241 | $1,069,922 |
28 | Puttman Farms | Spirit Lake, IA 51360 | $1,060,468 |
29 | Anthony Greg Opdahl | Hazel, SD 57242 | $1,055,799 |
30 | Luke Derrin Holzwarth | Hazel, SD 57242 | $1,044,386 |
31 | Donald Scott Little | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $1,042,709 |
32 | Barry Martin Little | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $1,030,506 |
33 | Richard Gisselbeck | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $1,019,545 |
34 | Leroy W Isaacson | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $1,017,296 |
35 | Kopman Brothers | Bryant, SD 57221 | $1,015,508 |
36 | Duane Alan Smith | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,003,238 |
37 | Curtis E Luken | Hazel, SD 57242 | $993,436 |
38 | Myron Martin Kuhlman | Hazel, SD 57242 | $980,537 |
39 | Roger Hamilton | Hazel, SD 57242 | $961,986 |
40 | Larry P Isaacson | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $955,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”