Farm Subsidy information
Hamlin County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,708
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $294,359,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jesse Hilliard | Bryant, SD 57221 | $937,284 |
42 | Harold Vernon Singrey | Hazel, SD 57242 | $935,753 |
43 | Allen Fugere | Estelline, SD 57234 | $927,958 |
44 | Dennis J Namken | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $923,478 |
45 | Circle B Honey Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $915,999 |
46 | Chad Douglas Noem | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $914,843 |
47 | Oxford Farms Inc | Hayti, SD 57241 | $887,472 |
48 | Chad Kenneth Schooley | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $856,150 |
49 | Rexford Schwartz | Bruce, SD 57220 | $839,666 |
50 | Herbert Mischke | Hazel, SD 57242 | $829,088 |
51 | Gary G Carstensen | Bryant, SD 57221 | $827,483 |
52 | Jerry L Runia | Estelline, SD 57234 | $819,861 |
53 | Dale & Mary Ann Williams Living Trust - Dale Willi | Estelline, SD 57234 | $812,712 |
54 | Dale Richard Thue | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $793,682 |
55 | Robert D Rommereim | Bryant, SD 57221 | $792,938 |
56 | Matthew J Stevenson | Hayti, SD 57241 | $781,770 |
57 | Roland Dennis Rust | Estelline, SD 57234 | $763,868 |
58 | Scott Popham | Hayti, SD 57241 | $758,927 |
59 | Jerry Lee Kiihl | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $755,033 |
60 | Gary Arthur Black | Estelline, SD 57234 | $698,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”