Market Loss Assistance Program in Hughes County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 389
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Hughes County, South Dakota totaled $7,701,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mike Ogan Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $452,748 |
2 | River View Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $242,672 |
3 | James & Barbara Beastrom Joint Ve | Pierre, SD 57501 | $149,682 |
4 | Nystrom Bay Farm Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $142,446 |
5 | Delbert Arthur Jones | Pierre, SD 57501 | $139,888 |
6 | Bowers Distillery Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $139,888 |
7 | Jones Family Land Ltd Partnership | Harrold, SD 57536 | $132,413 |
8 | Warriner Eugene/joan | Blunt, SD 57522 | $131,448 |
9 | Tom & Mary Tveit Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $128,536 |
10 | The Ross Sperry/jerry Sperry Part | Blunt, SD 57522 | $118,988 |
11 | Jon Charles Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $115,286 |
12 | Hansen Brothers | Harrold, SD 57536 | $111,104 |
13 | Hobert Ranches | Harrold, SD 57536 | $106,678 |
14 | Leslie J Stewart | Pierre, SD 57501 | $100,216 |
15 | Lynn Metzinger | Pierre, SD 57501 | $98,936 |
16 | James Bonnichsen | Blunt, SD 57522 | $97,294 |
17 | Jerry W Hawkins | Pierre, SD 57501 | $95,374 |
18 | Sheryl J Hawkins | Pierre, SD 57501 | $95,368 |
19 | Pillote Farms | Michigamme, MI 49861 | $92,702 |
20 | H J And Ma Downes And Sons | Carlsbad, CA 92011 | $92,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>