Farm Subsidy information

Kingsbury County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,265

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $436,733,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Kyle GrossIroquois, SD 57353$3,696,378
2John Emil AlbrechtDe Smet, SD 57231$3,655,289
3Fast View FarmsHuron, SD 57350$3,607,326
4Rick AughenbaughIroquois, SD 57353$3,095,740
5Alan AughenbaughIroquois, SD 57353$3,082,268
6Spring Lake ColonyArlington, SD 57212$2,943,356
7Page BrothersDe Smet, SD 57231$2,775,736
8E Weerts IncBancroft, SD 57353$2,628,470
9Vicky AughenbaughIroquois, SD 57353$2,568,139
10Collins Hutterian Brethren IncIroquois, SD 57353$2,511,672
11Kathy AughenbaughIroquois, SD 57353$2,447,364
12Frank E VirchowLake Preston, SD 57249$2,414,406
13Arthur S AndersenFort Meade, SD 57741$2,355,601
14H T Albrecht & Sons IncDe Smet, SD 57231$2,331,295
15William VirchowLake Preston, SD 57249$2,249,221
16Gregory Scott AlbrechtDe Smet, SD 57231$2,149,335
17Jeffrey Emil AlbrechtDe Smet, SD 57231$2,038,475
18Bradley John AlbrechtArlington, SD 57212$2,032,680
19Jon Charles AlbrechtHoward, SD 57349$1,954,544
20Loryn GehmDe Smet, SD 57231$1,898,180

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag