Farm Subsidy information

Kingsbury County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,265

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $436,733,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
21Roger HoyerArlington, SD 57212$1,863,011
22Wilkinson Ranch IncLake Preston, SD 57249$1,586,039
23Chad Alan MurphyArlington, SD 57212$1,538,528
24Hi Spirit Ranch IncDe Smet, SD 57231$1,494,470
25Paul Warren CasperLake Preston, SD 57249$1,467,972
26Rusche BrosBancroft, SD 57353$1,400,520
27Pleasant Hill FarmBancroft, SD 57353$1,378,509
28Edward Frank WilkinsonErwin, SD 57233$1,365,147
29Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$1,353,170
30Odegaard Family Farms IncLake Preston, SD 57249$1,316,268
31James P CoughlinIroquois, SD 57353$1,314,755
32Douglas Charles MeyerIroquois, SD 57353$1,286,826
33Lynn D JensenLake Preston, SD 57249$1,253,611
34Kingsbury Hutterian Brethren Inc.Willow Lake, SD 57278$1,228,802
35Bryan SneesbyLake Preston, SD 57249$1,218,405
36Jacobsen Farms IncLake Preston, SD 57249$1,201,039
37Dean Marvin TolzinLake Preston, SD 57249$1,188,172
38Mark Ely JohnsonDe Smet, SD 57231$1,175,403
39Whitewood Acres IncLake Preston, SD 57249$1,152,668
40Peckenpaugh Ranch IncCarthage, SD 57323$1,140,095

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag