Total Commodity Programs in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,978
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $205,792,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $3,044,975 |
2 | Spring Lake Colony | Arlington, SD 57212 | $2,725,154 |
3 | Kyle Gross | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $2,512,982 |
4 | Page Brothers | De Smet, SD 57231 | $2,494,599 |
5 | John Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $2,466,335 |
6 | Collins Hutterian Brethren Inc | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $2,371,853 |
7 | Alan Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $2,089,006 |
8 | Arthur S Andersen | Fort Meade, SD 57741 | $2,021,591 |
9 | Rick Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,993,930 |
10 | Frank E Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,986,158 |
11 | William Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,932,463 |
12 | H T Albrecht & Sons Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,926,993 |
13 | E Weerts Inc | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $1,877,949 |
14 | Vicky Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,774,678 |
15 | Roger Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,724,406 |
16 | Kathy Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,683,645 |
17 | Gregory Scott Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,664,453 |
18 | Jeffrey Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,664,337 |
19 | Bradley John Albrecht | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,658,918 |
20 | Loryn Gehm | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,614,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>