Dairy Programs in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 113
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Minnehaha County, South Dakota totaled $3,572,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Boadwine Farms Inc | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $436,522 |
2 | Robert Gregory & Douglas Ode Ptrs-royalwood Farms | Brandon, SD 57005 | $384,160 |
3 | Mooody County Dairy Limited Partnership | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $318,586 |
4 | Paul W Klein | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $268,768 |
5 | Brian Howe | Sherman, SD 57030 | $245,040 |
6 | Krogstad Brothers | Baltic, SD 57003 | $227,459 |
7 | Nielson Farms Incorporated | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $207,438 |
8 | Haagenson Farms Inc | Baltic, SD 57003 | $178,188 |
9 | Steven Howe | Sherman, SD 57030 | $106,935 |
10 | Bruce E Heggen | Brandon, SD 57005 | $105,023 |
11 | Shumaker Dairy Inc | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $104,347 |
12 | William F Ode | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $88,569 |
13 | Bradley Wayne Nussbaum | Garretson, SD 57030 | $76,784 |
14 | Richard L Oyen | Colton, SD 57018 | $69,107 |
15 | David L Hotchkiss | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $54,031 |
16 | Steven Wrage | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $47,834 |
17 | Lias Brothers | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $47,165 |
18 | Nathan Howe | Sherman, SD 57030 | $46,035 |
19 | Thomas Patrick Lias | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $42,871 |
20 | Kramer Partnership | Hartford, SD 57033 | $37,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>