Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 66
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $4,946,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lnl Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $885,548 |
2 | Rex & Leann Haskins Joint Venture | Pierre, SD 57501 | $485,681 |
3 | Kroeplin Farms General Partnership | Highmore, SD 57345 | $416,445 |
4 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $343,082 |
5 | Clark & Carmen Alleman Partnershi | Hayes, SD 57537 | $280,599 |
6 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $244,712 |
7 | Armstrong Farms | Pierre, SD 57501 | $193,839 |
8 | Ashley Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $189,131 |
9 | Kylan Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $188,594 |
10 | Mara Meier | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $173,361 |
11 | Al Meier | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $171,658 |
12 | Hand Bros Ptr | Midland, SD 57552 | $114,164 |
13 | David J Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $102,934 |
14 | Iva Wyly Russell | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $99,869 |
15 | Robert D Coverdale | Midland, SD 57552 | $86,076 |
16 | Kyle Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $81,041 |
17 | Mitch Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $78,960 |
18 | Bryan R Hedman | Brandon, SD 57005 | $77,453 |
19 | Leonda Beastrom Estate | Pierre, SD 57501 | $73,575 |
20 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $70,807 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>