Direct Payment Program in Stanley County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 269
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $13,546,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lnl Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $913,426 |
2 | Deadwood Trail Ranch | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $537,503 |
3 | Hand Bros Ptr | Midland, SD 57552 | $527,246 |
4 | Rex & Leann Haskins Joint Venture | Pierre, SD 57501 | $483,873 |
5 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $467,647 |
6 | Prairie View Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $318,930 |
7 | Crockett Mountain Ranch | Hayes, SD 57537 | $307,487 |
8 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $302,835 |
9 | Johnson Family Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $285,169 |
10 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $279,553 |
11 | The Stoeser Family Trust | Pierre, SD 57501 | $268,604 |
12 | Clarence Maxwell Jones | Hayes, SD 57537 | $253,940 |
13 | Rose Ranch Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $252,609 |
14 | Clark & Carmen Alleman Partnershi | Hayes, SD 57537 | $223,664 |
15 | Leonda Beastrom Estate | Pierre, SD 57501 | $219,250 |
16 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $214,440 |
17 | David J Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $207,943 |
18 | Michael M Nemec | Midland, SD 57552 | $206,390 |
19 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $206,225 |
20 | Rk Nielsen Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $195,929 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>