Farm Subsidy information
Walworth County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Walworth County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walworth County, South Dakota totaled $23,491,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lazy Tv Ranch | Selby, SD 57472 | $657,978 |
| 2 | Fiedler Farms Inc | Selby, SD 57472 | $431,249 |
| 3 | Kaiser Brothers Farms Inc | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $380,765 |
| 4 | Sandmeier Charolais Inc | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $370,141 |
| 5 | Robert And Kari Salverson Joint Venture | Mound City, SD 57646 | $359,606 |
| 6 | Hoffman Harvesting Inc | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $348,227 |
| 7 | Russell Farms Inc | Selby, SD 57472 | $316,572 |
| 8 | Schlomer Bros | Glenham, SD 57631 | $304,538 |
| 9 | Ch Skip Rau | Selby, SD 57472 | $302,364 |
| 10 | Kevin Kosel | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $268,894 |
| 11 | Corey Albert Sandmeier | Selby, SD 57472 | $254,934 |
| 12 | Sawinsky Inc | Selby, SD 57472 | $240,348 |
| 13 | Jfrey Inc | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $237,644 |
| 14 | Leo T Vojta | Glenham, SD 57631 | $232,981 |
| 15 | Brett Huber | Hoven, SD 57450 | $220,389 |
| 16 | Jc Farms Inc | Selby, SD 57472 | $216,052 |
| 17 | V M Zabels Inc | Lowry, SD 57472 | $215,332 |
| 18 | Leroy Beitelspacher | Bowdle, SD 57428 | $201,688 |
| 19 | Reuer Farm Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $195,128 |
| 20 | Wesley Moser | Glenham, SD 57631 | $187,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf