Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 15,668
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Tennessee totaled $134,876,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelley & Kelley Farms Partnership | Burlison, TN 38015 | $592,807 |
22 | C E Luckey & Sons | Humboldt, TN 38343 | $573,392 |
23 | Choctaw Planting Inc | Hickman, KY 42050 | $518,137 |
24 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $465,326 |
25 | Waits & Sons Farm Partnership | Burlison, TN 38015 | $458,175 |
26 | Mann Farms | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $453,751 |
27 | Hooper Farms | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $445,566 |
28 | Pugh Brothers | Halls, TN 38040 | $437,350 |
29 | Mud Lake Planting Co Ptr | Ridgely, TN 38080 | $435,818 |
30 | Tim Luckey Farms | Humboldt, TN 38343 | $422,658 |
31 | Verell Family Farms | Jackson, TN 38301 | $409,613 |
32 | Rege Luckey & Sons | Humboldt, TN 38343 | $407,441 |
33 | Clearview Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $401,457 |
34 | Frankie & Hedrick Shoaf Farms | Medina, TN 38355 | $397,371 |
35 | C & D Farms | Somerville, TN 38068 | $390,842 |
36 | Hill Planting Company | Gates, TN 38037 | $388,450 |
37 | Larry And Darlene Knox | Alamo, TN 38001 | $384,044 |
38 | Gerald Woods Jr Farm Partnership | Stanton, TN 38069 | $379,246 |
39 | Sikes Planting Co | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $374,127 |
40 | East Farms Partnership | Friendship, TN 38034 | $364,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”