Farm Subsidy information
Anderson County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Anderson County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 653
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Anderson County, Tennessee totaled $1,369,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David E Kitts | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $105,570 |
2 | Cynthia Michelle Hoefer | Powell, TN 37849 | $59,706 |
3 | Timothy L George | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $52,004 |
4 | Lydell Meier | Clinton, TN 37716 | $32,517 |
5 | James E Jones Jr | Clinton, TN 37716 | $28,969 |
6 | David L Bowling Sr | Heiskell, TN 37754 | $25,398 |
7 | Hollis Large | Clinton, TN 37716 | $21,530 |
8 | Robert Longmire | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $21,310 |
9 | Scot Winningham | Clinton, TN 37716 | $20,319 |
10 | Dal Patt | Powell, TN 37849 | $19,975 |
11 | Michael Irwin | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $18,597 |
12 | Christopher Walter George | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $17,669 |
13 | Tim Patt | Powell, TN 37849 | $17,500 |
14 | Brad Vannoy | Lake City, TN 37769 | $15,679 |
15 | Sharon Irwin | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $15,280 |
16 | Mountain View Limousin Farms | Heiskell, TN 37754 | $15,245 |
17 | James Queener | Clinton, TN 37716 | $14,211 |
18 | S Tyrone Foster | Heiskell, TN 37754 | $13,395 |
19 | Mark Longmire | Andersonville, TN 37705 | $12,809 |
20 | Charles R Brogdon | Clinton, TN 37716 | $12,367 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>