Direct Payment Program in Johnson County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 176
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Johnson County, Tennessee totaled $273,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maymead Farms Inc | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $88,358 |
| 2 | Vance G Gentry | Shady Valley, TN 37688 | $28,688 |
| 3 | John W Shull | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $23,196 |
| 4 | Skip Wills | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $9,574 |
| 5 | Asj Mathis Farms LLC | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $7,090 |
| 6 | Thomas P Worley Jr | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $6,821 |
| 7 | Jabin V Simcox Jr | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $6,469 |
| 8 | Richard L Snyder | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $6,341 |
| 9 | Doran Elbert Bunting | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $5,203 |
| 10 | William Dwayne Arney | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $5,149 |
| 11 | William W Hill | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $3,367 |
| 12 | Lonnie Royce Long | Shady Valley, TN 37688 | $3,040 |
| 13 | W Franklin Hodges Jr | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $2,824 |
| 14 | Steven Paul Brown | Zionville, NC 28698 | $2,775 |
| 15 | Terry T Matheson | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $2,708 |
| 16 | Wright Farms | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $2,120 |
| 17 | Louise M Shull | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $2,074 |
| 18 | Earl D Shull | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $2,000 |
| 19 | Anthony Van Arnold | Mountain City, TN 37683 | $1,873 |
| 20 | Paul Thomas Gragg | Vilas, NC 28692 | $1,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf