Production Flexibility Program in Brazoria County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 524
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Brazoria County, Texas totaled $41,782,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spoor Farms Jv | Angleton, TX 77515 | $1,274,660 |
| 2 | Olsovsky Farms Jv | Rosharon, TX 77583 | $1,089,368 |
| 3 | Harold Peltier & Sons Jv | Danbury, TX 77534 | $1,047,178 |
| 4 | Schovajsa Farms Jv | Rosharon, TX 77583 | $987,468 |
| 5 | Bailey Farms Jv | Angleton, TX 77515 | $937,559 |
| 6 | Bieri & Son | Angleton, TX 77516 | $835,616 |
| 7 | Max Wollam & Sons Partnership | Alvin, TX 77511 | $760,520 |
| 8 | Halewyn Farms Jv | Angleton, TX 77515 | $722,526 |
| 9 | Mowery Farms | Rosharon, TX 77583 | $715,406 |
| 10 | Wrw Farms | Alvin, TX 77511 | $623,831 |
| 11 | Garrett Farms Jv | Danbury, TX 77534 | $598,401 |
| 12 | Ricky & Randy Johnston | Crockett, TX 75835 | $536,676 |
| 13 | Ronald & Terri Duke Jv | Liverpool, TX 77577 | $529,714 |
| 14 | Anthony & Cindy Duke Jv | Alvin, TX 77512 | $493,148 |
| 15 | Jcm Farms Jv | Alvin, TX 77511 | $482,150 |
| 16 | C & C Farms | Sugar Land, TX 77487 | $481,100 |
| 17 | Scott & Toni Hairston Jv | Danbury, TX 77534 | $480,774 |
| 18 | Fred & Dianna Svahn | Alvin, TX 77511 | $474,916 |
| 19 | James And Deborah Northrup | Angleton, TX 77516 | $452,527 |
| 20 | Doty Rice Farms Jv | Alvin, TX 77511 | $445,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf