Farm Subsidy information
Cameron County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Cameron County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,748
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cameron County, Texas totaled $428,452,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Adams Farms | Combes, TX 78535 | $7,855,176 |
2 | T D Farms | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $5,244,230 |
3 | Albert & Sandra Perez Jv | Donna, TX 78537 | $4,743,068 |
4 | Har Vest | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $4,573,881 |
5 | Russell Plantation II | Los Fresnos, TX 78566 | $3,831,670 |
6 | L & L Farms | Brownsville, TX 78521 | $3,805,548 |
7 | Mark Abbott Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $3,092,114 |
8 | Leonard Simmons Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $2,916,109 |
9 | Cj Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $2,735,962 |
10 | Randy & Anita Mcmurray Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $2,712,010 |
11 | Waters Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $2,593,790 |
12 | Agri-steel | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $2,558,571 |
13 | Cherrington Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $2,500,058 |
14 | Davis & Davis | Combes, TX 78535 | $2,449,042 |
15 | Arroyo Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $2,432,107 |
16 | Daniel/marissa Perez | San Antonio, TX 78230 | $2,412,678 |
17 | Hartman West Farm & Ranch | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $2,403,163 |
18 | Buena Vista Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $2,267,154 |
19 | San Miguel Partnership | Brownsville, TX 78520 | $2,203,993 |
20 | Cholick Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $2,155,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>