Farm Subsidy information
Cameron County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Cameron County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 560
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cameron County, Texas totaled $17,102,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Albert & Sandra Perez Jv | Donna, TX 78537 | $293,201 |
2 | First Community Bank ** | Lyford, TX 78569 | $287,475 |
3 | Adams Farms | Combes, TX 78535 | $285,717 |
4 | Cj Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $267,485 |
5 | L & L Farms | Brownsville, TX 78521 | $248,900 |
6 | Leonard Simmons Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $210,958 |
7 | Har Vest | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $199,802 |
8 | Donald Bruce Waters | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $170,567 |
9 | Paul Floyd Jr | San Benito, TX 78586 | $169,774 |
10 | Mathers Farms Jv | Brownsville, TX 78520 | $160,971 |
11 | Billie D Simpson Jv | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $156,458 |
12 | Mid-valley Agriculture LLC | La Feria, TX 78559 | $149,289 |
13 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $140,020 |
14 | Russell Plantation II | Los Fresnos, TX 78566 | $129,951 |
15 | Jessica De La Fuente | Brownsville, TX 78520 | $128,997 |
16 | Waters Land & Cattle LLC | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $128,319 |
17 | Billie Mack Simpson Jv | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $126,529 |
18 | Z & K Farms | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $120,476 |
19 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $117,095 |
20 | William & Sherilyn Goad Farms | San Benito, TX 78586 | $104,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>