Farm Subsidy information
Chambers County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Chambers County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 671
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chambers County, Texas totaled $228,696,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Ranch | Stowell, TX 77661 | $4,074,122 |
2 | Windmill Rice Farms | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $3,249,997 |
3 | Clint Fancher Monroe City Farms | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $2,954,364 |
4 | Gilbert Farms | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $2,755,041 |
5 | Fitzgerald Farms | Winnie, TX 77665 | $2,542,228 |
6 | S White Farms | Stowell, TX 77661 | $2,503,159 |
7 | L & C Farms | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $2,355,642 |
8 | Capital Farm Credit ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $2,203,937 |
9 | Langley Family Farms | Beaumont, TX 77706 | $2,075,726 |
10 | A Wolf And Son | Mont Belvieu, TX 77580 | $2,067,811 |
11 | David Edwards | Stowell, TX 77661 | $1,924,771 |
12 | Steven & Rhonda Devillier Farms | Winnie, TX 77665 | $1,901,732 |
13 | Joe A & Lori D Presnall | Baytown, TX 77520 | $1,874,244 |
14 | Jerry Devillier Farms | Winnie, TX 77665 | $1,861,279 |
15 | Bobby Jack Enloe | Montgomery, TX 77316 | $1,786,255 |
16 | Jones & Allen Farms | Winnie, TX 77665 | $1,785,293 |
17 | Country Farm | Winnie, TX 77665 | $1,733,804 |
18 | John W Jenkins | Hankamer, TX 77560 | $1,732,578 |
19 | Schultz Farm | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $1,724,807 |
20 | Otho E Turner | Hankamer, TX 77560 | $1,700,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>