Farm Subsidy information
Gaines County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Gaines County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,791
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gaines County, Texas totaled $1,477,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lee Jameson | Seminole, TX 79360 | $3,194,816 |
22 | Glen Shook - The Shook Family Trust D Shook | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $3,072,979 |
23 | Rex Darby | Seminole, TX 79360 | $3,040,498 |
24 | John & Neta Loepky Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $3,028,312 |
25 | Fnr-connor Partnership | Lamesa, TX 79331 | $2,995,161 |
26 | Dean Faulkenberry | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $2,993,512 |
27 | Freeman Ag | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $2,984,823 |
28 | Shelby S Medlin | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $2,979,622 |
29 | David And Joy Oates Farms | Loop, TX 79342 | $2,960,234 |
30 | Peter Bergen Farms Inc | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,925,903 |
31 | A L H M Inc | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,878,019 |
32 | Ted Higginbottom | College Station, TX 77845 | $2,872,773 |
33 | Kenneth D Darby | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,842,642 |
34 | Julie S Jameson | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,822,062 |
35 | Kara E Love | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $2,816,905 |
36 | Dollie J Ellison | Seagraves, TX 79359 | $2,800,349 |
37 | Nueve Partnership | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,797,253 |
38 | F A C E Inc | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,743,245 |
39 | Ross A Tyler | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $2,685,714 |
40 | Ben Nichols | Seminole, TX 79360 | $2,684,204 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”