Farm Subsidy information

Glasscock County, Texas

Total Subsidies in Glasscock County, Texas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,158

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glasscock County, Texas totaled $348,477,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
21John B PhillipsGarden City, TX 79739$1,452,808
22Lorin S Mcdowell IIIBig Spring, TX 79720$1,428,785
23Michael Glenn BatlaMidland, TX 79706$1,419,426
24D & K Schaefer Farms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,410,785
25Ronnie Hirt Fms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,327,535
26Scott Halfmann Farms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,325,195
27Doyle Schaefer Farms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,321,566
28Eugene Hirt FmsGarden City, TX 79739$1,294,735
29Jeremy LouderStanton, TX 79782$1,285,260
30Joe D Schwartz Fms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,244,492
31Lacy Creek Farms JvGarden City, TX 79739$1,182,988
32Rory Niehues Fms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,182,646
33R Mcdowell Ranches IncBig Spring, TX 79720$1,177,102
34Chris MatschekGarden City, TX 79739$1,154,803
35Nathan HalfmannGarden City, TX 79739$1,140,946
36Ricky Halfmann Farms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,135,638
37Carey Niehues Fms IncGarden City, TX 79739$1,085,323
38Russell & Kim Halfmann JvGarden City, TX 79739$1,079,617
39Darrell HalfmannGarden City, TX 79739$1,071,989
40Tommy Edward HalfmannSan Angelo, TX 76904$1,066,170

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag