Farm Subsidy information
Howard County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Howard County, Texas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 778
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Howard County, Texas totaled $21,416,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Royce L Walker | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $124,645 |
22 | Rodney & Carolyn Brooks Jv | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $123,482 |
23 | B-cot Inc | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $123,186 |
24 | Preston Zant & Ethan Zant | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $120,384 |
25 | Jerrod & Stacy Beall Farms Jv | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $116,451 |
26 | Aaron Taylor Peterson | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $114,820 |
27 | Michael & Chandra Farms Inc | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $113,443 |
28 | Taylor & Cayley Peterson LLC | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $112,724 |
29 | Kirk Thomas Farms Inc | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $108,410 |
30 | F M Farms Inc | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $107,658 |
31 | Andrew J Newton | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $104,929 |
32 | Harding Farms | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $103,830 |
33 | Circle B Farms Inc | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $102,504 |
34 | Double Z | Ackerly, TX 79713 | $101,681 |
35 | Austen C Newton | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $101,277 |
36 | Yarbar Ranch Corporation | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $99,963 |
37 | Collin & Kassi Farms Inc | Coahoma, TX 79511 | $99,406 |
38 | Harold Martin | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $97,674 |
39 | Kelly Gaskins Farms Inc | Shamrock, TX 79079 | $85,789 |
40 | K Newton Investments Inc | Big Spring, TX 79721 | $84,144 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”