Direct Payment Program in Hudspeth County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Hudspeth County, Texas totaled $6,174,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miller Brother Joint Venture | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $735,909 |
| 2 | Border Land Farms | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $706,705 |
| 3 | Randy Armstrong | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $512,761 |
| 4 | Billie Armstrong | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $419,532 |
| 5 | Harvey Hilley Jr | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $376,694 |
| 6 | Gene W Strachan | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $224,513 |
| 7 | Dorothy Ivey Strachan | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $200,037 |
| 8 | R Farms Flp Ltd | Dell City, TX 79837 | $183,399 |
| 9 | Curtis L Carr | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $167,379 |
| 10 | John Ainsworth | Dell City, TX 79837 | $132,365 |
| 11 | Adela Carr | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $115,495 |
| 12 | Guadalupe Mountain Farms | Horizon City, TX 79928 | $109,964 |
| 13 | Grijalva Family Trust | Fabens, TX 79838 | $107,952 |
| 14 | Jim & Sue Bean Farms | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $95,689 |
| 15 | La Paloma Farms | Dell City, TX 79837 | $89,807 |
| 16 | Tyn Davis | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $87,275 |
| 17 | Marlin Keith Richardson | Dell City, TX 79837 | $85,006 |
| 18 | Cimarron Agricultural Ltd | El Paso, TX 79902 | $77,957 |
| 19 | James A Lynch Jr | Dell City, TX 79837 | $77,247 |
| 20 | Jose Luis Galvan | Fort Hancock, TX 79839 | $67,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf