Farm Subsidy information
Jim Hogg County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jim Hogg County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jim Hogg County, Texas totaled $1,905,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | East Foundation Ranches LLC | San Antonio, TX 78216 | $250,000 |
2 | Jones Ranch LLC | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $217,734 |
3 | Bill Barfield | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $57,515 |
4 | Lopez Cattle Co LLC | Laredo, TX 78040 | $52,817 |
5 | Pdh Ranch Investment LLC | Tulsa, OK 74135 | $50,172 |
6 | Violeta Beefmasters Ld | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $43,295 |
7 | El Gato Ranch Inc | Bastrop, TX 78602 | $36,282 |
8 | Erasmo Montemayor | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $34,080 |
9 | W W Jones III | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $29,793 |
10 | Harbison Ranch Company Ltd | Austin, TX 78735 | $28,873 |
11 | Ernesto R Gutierrez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $25,373 |
12 | Jorge A Pena | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $23,809 |
13 | Alfonso Montalvo | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $23,622 |
14 | Eduardo S Montalvo | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $20,814 |
15 | Humberto D Martinez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $19,382 |
16 | Victor M Garcia | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $17,493 |
17 | Armstrong Ranch Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $17,424 |
18 | Mario Martinez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $15,364 |
19 | Perfecta G Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $15,156 |
20 | Noriecitas Ranch | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $14,884 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>