Total Commodity Programs in Karnes County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 209
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Karnes County, Texas totaled $766,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Janysek Farms LLC | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $57,356 |
| 2 | Natho Brothers LLC | Runge, TX 78151 | $50,117 |
| 3 | Zachary X Yanta II | Runge, TX 78151 | $46,466 |
| 4 | J V Cattle Company | Hobson, TX 78117 | $40,585 |
| 5 | Patrick Tam | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $39,838 |
| 6 | Nathan Moy | Anderson, TX 77830 | $22,596 |
| 7 | Yanta Brothers LLC | Runge, TX 78151 | $19,071 |
| 8 | Vernon Janssen II | Runge, TX 78151 | $18,740 |
| 9 | Michael J Pawelek | San Antonio, TX 78256 | $17,876 |
| 10 | Scott Hall Land & Cattle Company Lp | Nordheim, TX 78141 | $16,611 |
| 11 | Jason A Mutz | Falls City, TX 78113 | $15,354 |
| 12 | James R Krueger | Runge, TX 78151 | $14,218 |
| 13 | Margaret J Moczygemba | Hobson, TX 78117 | $13,299 |
| 14 | Kopecki Farms LLC | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $13,108 |
| 15 | Vernon C Janssen III | Runge, TX 78151 | $12,882 |
| 16 | Blevins G Bundick | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $12,348 |
| 17 | Jimmy Krause | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $11,907 |
| 18 | Joshua Tielke Dba Sweet T Cattle Company | Karnes City, TX 78118 | $11,151 |
| 19 | Nichols Ranch/jim Tom Nichols Inc | Kenedy, TX 78119 | $9,807 |
| 20 | Donnie Fischer | Stockdale, TX 78160 | $9,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf