Farm Subsidy information
Live Oak County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Live Oak County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,297
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Live Oak County, Texas totaled $71,689,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Allan Krietsch | George West, TX 78022 | $1,695,517 |
2 | Thoms Farms Inc | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $1,669,121 |
3 | Schilling Farms | George West, TX 78022 | $1,266,207 |
4 | Michael Wayne Dubose | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $896,556 |
5 | Rocking W Farms | Skidmore, TX 78389 | $820,866 |
6 | Tom C Brookshire | Corpus Christi, TX 78404 | $725,859 |
7 | Ricky Verlon Maguglin | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $653,086 |
8 | Ruth Blaschke | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $630,242 |
9 | Mark Katzfey | George West, TX 78022 | $589,210 |
10 | C Ray & Lorain Brown Farms | Mathis, TX 78368 | $548,207 |
11 | Lasca Butler Searcy Trust | Port Aransas, TX 78373 | $486,288 |
12 | C W Wood Jr | Calliham, TX 78007 | $461,591 |
13 | Charles Ray Brown | Mathis, TX 78368 | $445,964 |
14 | O Garza Ranch Inc | George West, TX 78022 | $411,867 |
15 | Richard A Lee | George West, TX 78022 | $407,318 |
16 | Rosalee Coleman Ltd | George West, TX 78022 | $401,262 |
17 | Lee Lamar Wallek | Beeville, TX 78102 | $380,005 |
18 | Robert Brysch | George West, TX 78022 | $375,545 |
19 | Dillon Mundorf | Three Rivers, TX 78071 | $359,982 |
20 | Alfred Henicke | Beeville, TX 78102 | $352,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>