Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 560
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $13,573,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strain Ranches | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $495,752 |
| 2 | Aimbank ** | Plains, TX 79355 | $427,334 |
| 3 | Spade Ranches Limited | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $405,500 |
| 4 | Cox Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $391,884 |
| 5 | Munoz Brothers Partnership | Loraine, TX 79532 | $319,393 |
| 6 | Morris Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $256,895 |
| 7 | Dunn Farms | Ira, TX 79527 | $234,622 |
| 8 | Roscoe State Bank | Roscoe, TX 79545 | $219,691 |
| 9 | First Bank & Trust Co ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $197,796 |
| 10 | Wallis Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $177,217 |
| 11 | Champion Creek Farms LLC | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $173,235 |
| 12 | Hoyle & Hoyle | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $168,582 |
| 13 | Tr Cattle Co | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $166,728 |
| 14 | Maddox Ranch Partnership | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $163,347 |
| 15 | Bull Creek Ranch | Big Spring, TX 79720 | $149,577 |
| 16 | Watlington Farms Dba | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $135,218 |
| 17 | Ashton A Raschke | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $121,850 |
| 18 | Kelsey Ann Raschke | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $121,850 |
| 19 | Tanner J Cox | Loraine, TX 79532 | $116,960 |
| 20 | Richard Lynn Bradbury | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $91,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf