Total Conservation Programs in Mitchell County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 837
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $39,783,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rebecca Alvarez | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $289,384 |
22 | Tommy Morris | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $288,150 |
23 | Kirk Morris | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $277,951 |
24 | J W Strain | El Prado, NM 87529 | $263,214 |
25 | Linden Solomon | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $261,390 |
26 | Thomas L Rees Jr | Sweetwater, TX 79556 | $249,852 |
27 | Brennand Lazy H Ranch Ltd | Houston, TX 77057 | $247,243 |
28 | Eddie H Strain | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $240,337 |
29 | William H Blum | Brenham, TX 77833 | $227,451 |
30 | Marvin R Hardy Sr | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 | $227,379 |
31 | Alma Smith | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $223,931 |
32 | Kathryn G Pendergrass | Sweetwater, TX 79556 | $221,691 |
33 | James Richardson | Llano, TX 78643 | $220,167 |
34 | David W Hutchins | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $219,203 |
35 | Mtf Properties LLC | Lake Havaser City, AZ 86406 | $216,624 |
36 | Huron Dorn Farm | Comanche, TX 76442 | $214,177 |
37 | Biggs Farm Acct Ptrshp | Arlington, TX 76012 | $213,947 |
38 | Mike T Hemphill | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $211,233 |
39 | Waters & Waters Services Inc | Goldsmith, TX 79741 | $206,872 |
40 | Jeremy Strain | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $202,524 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”