Total Commodity Programs in Mitchell County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,747
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $86,050,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Morris Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,411,808 |
2 | Strain Ranches | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $2,173,939 |
3 | Munoz Brothers Partnership | Loraine, TX 79532 | $1,910,913 |
4 | Cox Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,836,118 |
5 | Wallis Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,700,720 |
6 | Hoyle & Hoyle | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,363,110 |
7 | Dunn Farms | Ira, TX 79527 | $1,341,730 |
8 | Fuller Farms | Granbury, TX 76048 | $1,269,017 |
9 | Russell Erwin & Shelley Smith Rus | Westbrook, TX 79565 | $1,159,305 |
10 | Csc Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,147,166 |
11 | Robert David Stubblefield | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,117,341 |
12 | T&p Shaw Farms | Snyder, TX 79549 | $1,079,699 |
13 | Cox Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,044,169 |
14 | Richard Lynn Bradbury | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,007,060 |
15 | Lester Finley | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $1,002,013 |
16 | Randall C Anderson | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $978,262 |
17 | Woodrow W Anderson | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $937,851 |
18 | Donald Smith | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $924,808 |
19 | Aimbank ** | Plains, TX 79355 | $891,082 |
20 | Jeffrey S Oliver | Loraine, TX 79532 | $850,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>