Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, Texas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 508
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, Texas totaled $10,723,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $514,622 |
| 2 | Strain Ranches | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $389,469 |
| 3 | Munoz Brothers Partnership | Loraine, TX 79532 | $280,187 |
| 4 | Aimbank ** | Plains, TX 79355 | $263,500 |
| 5 | Wallis Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $218,184 |
| 6 | Tanner J Cox | Loraine, TX 79532 | $183,303 |
| 7 | Morris Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $166,041 |
| 8 | Champion Creek Farms LLC | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $164,400 |
| 9 | Dunn Farms | Ira, TX 79527 | $152,926 |
| 10 | Csc Farms | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $152,692 |
| 11 | Hoyle & Hoyle | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $138,627 |
| 12 | Kelsey Ann Raschke | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $120,785 |
| 13 | Watlington Farms Dba | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $115,619 |
| 14 | Joe L Rivera | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $96,317 |
| 15 | Ashton A Raschke | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $94,410 |
| 16 | First Bank & Trust Co ** | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $90,225 |
| 17 | Tr Cattle Co | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $88,798 |
| 18 | Garcia Farms Dba | Loraine, TX 79532 | $87,194 |
| 19 | Richard Lynn Bradbury | Colorado City, TX 79512 | $76,618 |
| 20 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $73,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf