Cotton Ginning Program in Reagan County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 83
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Reagan County, Texas totaled $1,469,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phillip & Judy Bales Farms | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $92,248 |
| 2 | Rocking H Meyer Farms, Inc. | Garden City, TX 79739 | $75,960 |
| 3 | Weishuhn Ag Services Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $71,142 |
| 4 | G&e Cotton Farms Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $67,478 |
| 5 | Allen J Jansa | Garden City, TX 79739 | $58,234 |
| 6 | Alfred Schwartz Jr | Garden City, TX 79739 | $53,286 |
| 7 | Double H Ranch | Knickerbocker, TX 76939 | $49,274 |
| 8 | Duane Braden | Garden City, TX 79739 | $47,160 |
| 9 | Whit Braden | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $45,451 |
| 10 | Dsb Farms | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $44,786 |
| 11 | Derek Charles Dieringer | Garden City, TX 79739 | $44,135 |
| 12 | Michalewicz Farms Inc | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $40,585 |
| 13 | Daniel Michalewicz | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $40,202 |
| 14 | Russell Wade Eggemeyer | Midkiff, TX 79755 | $37,833 |
| 15 | David Weishuhn | Garden City, TX 79739 | $35,792 |
| 16 | Gary L Streicher | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $34,041 |
| 17 | Streicher Farms Inc | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $33,642 |
| 18 | April Braden | Garden City, TX 79739 | $33,011 |
| 19 | Ramiro Anthony Garza III | Midland, TX 79706 | $32,480 |
| 20 | Kenneth D Braden | Garden City, TX 79739 | $31,935 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf