Conservation Reserve Program in San Patricio County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 43
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in San Patricio County, Texas totaled $933,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lonnie Glasscock III | Mathis, TX 78368 | $116,288 |
2 | A E Teltschik | Taft, TX 78390 | $100,354 |
3 | Margaret Ann Whipple | Mathis, TX 78368 | $65,340 |
4 | R Bryan Gulley | Corpus Christi, TX 78414 | $49,691 |
5 | John T Kircher Jr | Robstown, TX 78380 | $45,792 |
6 | David Lee Kircher | Robstown, TX 78380 | $45,792 |
7 | Lonnie Glasscock Iv | Mathis, TX 78368 | $42,960 |
8 | Chloe Glasscock Williams | Mathis, TX 78368 | $42,960 |
9 | Lonnie Glasscock Iv Tr | Mathis, TX 78368 | $42,960 |
10 | Chloe Glasscock Tr | Mathis, TX 78368 | $42,960 |
11 | Garry Mcclenaghan | Rockport, TX 78382 | $35,106 |
12 | Sinton Presbyterian Church Inc | Sinton, TX 78387 | $28,803 |
13 | Presbyterian Childrens Home | Austin, TX 78746 | $28,802 |
14 | John B Mayo Inc | Taft, TX 78390 | $25,128 |
15 | James D Mayo | Taft, TX 78390 | $21,496 |
16 | G W Henrichson Family Trust | Blanco, TX 78606 | $21,409 |
17 | Mattie Belle Henrichson Family Tr | Blanco, TX 78606 | $21,408 |
18 | Daniel D Fromme | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $21,192 |
19 | Marjorie Hartmann Claybrook | Woodsboro, TX 78393 | $17,376 |
20 | Fernando Hernandez Jr | Sinton, TX 78387 | $16,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>