Direct Payment Program in Starr County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 331
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $9,891,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Juan Villanueva III | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $130,862 |
22 | Jorge Luis Saenz | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $125,404 |
23 | Tomas E Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $110,629 |
24 | Starr Produce Company | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $101,075 |
25 | Teplicek Farms | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $93,165 |
26 | K & P Farms | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $91,698 |
27 | F M Cattle Co | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $88,974 |
28 | Jeffrey Ray Respondek | Mission, TX 78574 | $88,313 |
29 | Davis Farms | Victoria, TX 77901 | $85,791 |
30 | Armando Gonzalez | Edcouch, TX 78538 | $80,943 |
31 | Vicky I Flores | Edinburg, TX 78542 | $80,190 |
32 | Omar Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $79,035 |
33 | Thomas C Wheat | Corpus Christi, TX 78466 | $70,792 |
34 | Wilfred J Klement | Mission, TX 78572 | $69,128 |
35 | Ricky Shane Durbin Dba Shane Durb | Elsa, TX 78543 | $68,363 |
36 | Southwest Farm & Ranch Inc | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $63,234 |
37 | Rancho Estrella | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $62,376 |
38 | Rancho Estrella | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $62,376 |
39 | William J Davis Jr | Victoria, TX 77901 | $61,789 |
40 | George Adam Fike Jr | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $59,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”