Farm Subsidy information
Sterling County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Sterling County, Texas, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sterling County, Texas totaled $1,803,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nine Six Livestock Co | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $211,181 |
| 2 | Sterling Cole | San Angelo, TX 76906 | $158,235 |
| 3 | Frank And Sims Price Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $118,051 |
| 4 | Colby Frizzell | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $93,558 |
| 5 | W Bar F Cattle LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $90,815 |
| 6 | Hodges Ranch Inc | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $74,155 |
| 7 | John Gay Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $59,879 |
| 8 | Tory Morrison | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $49,537 |
| 9 | Little F Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $48,478 |
| 10 | Sterling Dry Creek LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $40,011 |
| 11 | Rw Foster & Sons LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $34,273 |
| 12 | Wesley Glass | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $33,818 |
| 13 | Jeffery B Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $30,250 |
| 14 | Copeland Land & Cattle LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $29,083 |
| 15 | John R Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $28,960 |
| 16 | Bill B Allen | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $26,591 |
| 17 | R T Mackie | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $26,393 |
| 18 | Sterling Lamb LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $25,741 |
| 19 | Tommy Lee Wright Jr | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $24,071 |
| 20 | Troy Millican | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $21,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf