Total Commodity Programs in Sterling County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 139
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sterling County, Texas totaled $4,275,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Reynolds Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $56,938 |
22 | Reed & Stewart | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $56,009 |
23 | Rw Foster & Sons LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $53,549 |
24 | W & W Foster | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $51,063 |
25 | Tory Morrison | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $49,887 |
26 | V & J Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $42,798 |
27 | Sterling Dry Creek LLC | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $42,091 |
28 | John C Dorn | Tulia, TX 79088 | $41,629 |
29 | Cinco Terry Lp Dba Cinco Cattle C | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $39,299 |
30 | Wesley Zane Hodges | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $35,949 |
31 | Caldwell & Palmer | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $34,639 |
32 | Wesley Glass | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $33,781 |
33 | W L Foster Ranch Ltd | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $33,612 |
34 | Trina Beth Johnson | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $31,629 |
35 | Michael C Bodine | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $31,426 |
36 | Jeffery B Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $30,495 |
37 | Stroman Ranch L C | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $30,362 |
38 | John R Copeland | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $29,508 |
39 | Bar Heart Ranch | Sterling City, TX 76951 | $29,129 |
40 | Andy Smith Jr | Water Valley, TX 76958 | $24,208 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”