Total Commodity Programs in Zavala County, Texas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 329
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Zavala County, Texas totaled $42,865,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James R & Melody Speer Ranch Jv | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $2,869,880 |
| 2 | Neal & Lori Brewster Farms | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $2,419,595 |
| 3 | 3-k Farms | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $1,845,285 |
| 4 | Wl Farms LLC | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $1,381,116 |
| 5 | Laffere Farms LLC | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $1,365,736 |
| 6 | Merle Moerbe Farms | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $1,338,391 |
| 7 | L & L Farms LLC | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $1,276,441 |
| 8 | Carnes Farms Inc | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $1,261,460 |
| 9 | Jack Rutledge | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $1,005,652 |
| 10 | Danny Parker Farms | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $988,302 |
| 11 | Eddy A Carnes | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $940,132 |
| 12 | Encino Farm Inc | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $930,223 |
| 13 | Walter O Moerbe III | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $918,869 |
| 14 | Hurd Ranch Company Ltd | San Antonio, TX 78209 | $814,860 |
| 15 | Joe E Hargrove | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $734,282 |
| 16 | Charles D Laffere Estate | Uvalde, TX 78802 | $729,329 |
| 17 | M L & Virginia L Coleman J V | Batesville, TX 78829 | $696,458 |
| 18 | Rutledge Enterprise Inc | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $667,381 |
| 19 | Jeffrey Grissom | Uvalde, TX 78801 | $611,372 |
| 20 | Edward W Ritchie III | La Pryor, TX 78872 | $504,008 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf