Total Conservation Programs in Utah, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,740
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Utah totaled $210,438,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M Dee Kunzler & Son Ranches | Park Valley, UT 84329 | $2,789,867 |
2 | C Bar Cattle Co | Malta, ID 83342 | $2,229,937 |
3 | Cv Ranches | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $1,344,390 |
4 | M Dunford Weston Family Partnership | Logan, UT 84321 | $1,324,826 |
5 | Ault Farms | American Fork, UT 84003 | $1,314,037 |
6 | Frank Rees Farms Limited | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $1,267,110 |
7 | Sandall Farm & Ranch Family Partn | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $1,265,403 |
8 | Yale Johnson | Laketown, UT 84038 | $1,172,209 |
9 | N D Or R Grover Partnership | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $1,159,395 |
10 | Putnam Ranch Llp | Randolph, UT 84064 | $1,074,383 |
11 | Cedar Valley Farms LLC | Cedar Valley, UT 84013 | $1,060,337 |
12 | Larry W Miller Family Partnership | Logan, UT 84323 | $1,057,731 |
13 | Owen Poole | Monticello, UT 84535 | $1,040,525 |
14 | Richard Elmer | Ogden, UT 84414 | $1,038,937 |
15 | Holmgren Land & Livestock Company | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $1,009,677 |
16 | Jimmie L Mcwilliams | Nephi, UT 84648 | $994,596 |
17 | Richard T Paxman | Nephi, UT 84648 | $977,172 |
18 | Rim Ranch LLC | Vernal, UT 84078 | $947,959 |
19 | Suzanne A Halliday | Monticello, UT 84535 | $935,365 |
20 | Scott Holbrook | Lehi, UT 84043 | $877,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>