Farm Subsidy information
Wasatch County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Wasatch County, Utah, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 266
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wasatch County, Utah totaled $6,062,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cedar View Dairy LLC | Heber City, UT 84032 | $616,086 |
| 2 | E Ray Okelberry Joint Venture | Fountain Green, UT 84632 | $504,144 |
| 3 | Obr Joint Venture | Goshen, UT 84633 | $289,361 |
| 4 | Allen H Sweat | Heber City, UT 84032 | $225,366 |
| 5 | Scott Olsen Sheep | Spanish Fork, UT 84660 | $209,849 |
| 6 | George P Holmes | Heber City, UT 84032 | $204,055 |
| 7 | Brb Livestock Co | Sandy, UT 84070 | $183,113 |
| 8 | Red Pine Ranches, Inc. | Oakley, UT 84055 | $167,915 |
| 9 | Eph Jensen Livestock LLC | Tremonton, UT 84337 | $166,600 |
| 10 | Canyon View Farms LLC | Midway, UT 84049 | $137,020 |
| 11 | Remund Dairy Inc % Roy Remund | Midway, UT 84049 | $128,813 |
| 12 | Thomas Laren Provost | Heber City, UT 84032 | $115,574 |
| 13 | Bitner Creek LLC | Holladay, UT 84117 | $114,757 |
| 14 | Dc Land & Livestock Lc | Kamas, UT 84036 | $111,262 |
| 15 | Mac Jessen | Altamont, UT 84001 | $107,354 |
| 16 | Lamar Christensen | Heber City, UT 84032 | $96,154 |
| 17 | Alan Dean Brown | Heber City, UT 84032 | $84,002 |
| 18 | Phyllis Christensen | Heber City, UT 84032 | $82,561 |
| 19 | Canyon View Dairy % Grant Kohler | Midway, UT 84049 | $81,894 |
| 20 | Stephen A Osguthorpe | Park City, UT 84060 | $80,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf