Production Flexibility Program in Orange County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Orange County, Vermont totaled $341,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walter M Gladstone | Bradford, VT 05033 | $38,808 |
2 | Knoxland Farm Inc | Bradford, VT 05033 | $34,519 |
3 | Harkdale Farms Inc | Newbury, VT 05051 | $27,759 |
4 | Vaughan Farms LLC | East Thetford, VT 05043 | $27,542 |
5 | Kenneth & Sallyann Carson | Bradford, VT 05033 | $24,426 |
6 | Ekolott Farm | Newbury, VT 05051 | $22,514 |
7 | Wilfred J Sweet | Topsham, VT 05076 | $9,017 |
8 | Herbert & Beverly Hodge | Fairlee, VT 05045 | $8,643 |
9 | Richard & John Button | Chelsea, VT 05038 | $8,284 |
10 | Charles D White | Corinth, VT 05039 | $7,226 |
11 | Frederick P Howard | North Thetford, VT 05054 | $6,884 |
12 | Cr Farm Inc | Newbury, VT 05051 | $6,714 |
13 | Birch Meadow Farm | Fairlee, VT 05045 | $6,443 |
14 | John Keith Sprague III | Brookfield, VT 05036 | $6,409 |
15 | Richard Lambert | Graniteville, VT 05654 | $5,971 |
16 | Warren E Preston | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $5,870 |
17 | Vermont Technical College | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $5,752 |
18 | Gulick Farms - Old | Fairlee, VT 05045 | $5,479 |
19 | Pinello Farm | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $5,457 |
20 | Donald And Sally Sanford | Chelsea, VT 05038 | $4,750 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>