Total Disaster Programs in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 296
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $5,315,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers Phyllis & Andrew | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $355,783 |
| 2 | Carl Vladyka | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $158,108 |
| 3 | Frank J Grabowski | Castleton, VT 05735 | $141,944 |
| 4 | Harvey Farms | Florence, VT 05744 | $140,738 |
| 5 | Deer Flats Farm, LLC | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $136,856 |
| 6 | Theodore Grembowicz | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $133,265 |
| 7 | Harold F Allen | Castleton, VT 05735 | $117,848 |
| 8 | Sheldon Farm Inc | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $103,782 |
| 9 | Cash R Ruane | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $87,585 |
| 10 | Charron Farms Inc | West Haven, VT 05743 | $80,041 |
| 11 | Raymond W Richards | West Haven, VT 05743 | $79,133 |
| 12 | Paul & Kari Lussier | Benson, VT 05743 | $76,079 |
| 13 | Bartholomew Brothers, Inc. | Benson, VT 05743 | $70,510 |
| 14 | Jeffrey L Noble | Benson, VT 05743 | $69,680 |
| 15 | Mark And Andrea Winslow | Pittsford, VT 05763 | $69,444 |
| 16 | Finnell Hollow Farm Inc | Poultney, VT 05764 | $69,227 |
| 17 | Henry J Daley Sr | Benson, VT 05743 | $69,191 |
| 18 | David T Parker | North Chittenden, VT 05763 | $62,962 |
| 19 | Gerald A Hathaway | Benson, VT 05743 | $62,659 |
| 20 | Steven Or Patrick Saltis | Poultney, VT 05764 | $61,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf