Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 209
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $665,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pond Hill Ranch | Castleton, VT 05735 | $14,927 |
2 | Bartholomew Brothers, Inc. | Benson, VT 05743 | $13,670 |
3 | Woodlawn Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $12,202 |
4 | Steven Or Patrick Saltis | Poultney, VT 05764 | $11,880 |
5 | Jesse D Billings III | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $11,846 |
6 | Book Bros Inc | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $11,478 |
7 | Rodney & Alida Tarbell | Middletown Springs, VT 05757 | $11,322 |
8 | David T Parker | North Chittenden, VT 05763 | $11,294 |
9 | Harvey Farms | Florence, VT 05744 | $10,998 |
10 | Mach Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $10,950 |
11 | Claycreek Farm | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $10,683 |
12 | Deer Flats Farm, LLC | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $10,108 |
13 | Eagan Farm | Castleton, VT 05735 | $9,003 |
14 | Sheldon Farm Inc | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $8,752 |
15 | Glen C Hayward Jr | Castleton, VT 05735 | $8,552 |
16 | Raymond W Richards | West Haven, VT 05743 | $8,256 |
17 | Timothy & Nancy Bryant | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $8,114 |
18 | Finnell Hollow Farm Inc | Poultney, VT 05764 | $8,103 |
19 | Julanne Or Neal Sharrow | Shrewsbury, VT 05738 | $7,898 |
20 | Shaun L Young | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $7,681 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>