Production Flexibility Program in Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,467
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Virginia totaled $134,903,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glenn Hayes Hawkins | Emporia, VA 23847 | $247,886 |
22 | Seward Farms Partnership | Elberon, VA 23846 | $243,897 |
23 | Paul M House | Nokesville, VA 20181 | $243,348 |
24 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $243,075 |
25 | Greenway Farms Ltd | Suffolk, VA 23438 | $241,682 |
26 | Frank Holland Jr | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $236,393 |
27 | Evelynton Farms Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $233,466 |
28 | Lyle Pugh | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $231,033 |
29 | Bruce R Spady | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $230,964 |
30 | Dana Todd | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $230,110 |
31 | F T Williams | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $227,723 |
32 | M & W Farms | Suffolk, VA 23434 | $224,922 |
33 | John R Darden III | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $223,040 |
34 | Riverside Farm Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $220,968 |
35 | Stephenson Farms Inc | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $220,005 |
36 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $217,370 |
37 | Beechland Farms Inc | Elberon, VA 23846 | $216,502 |
38 | John F Davis | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $212,242 |
39 | Li'l Bud's Farms Inc | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $212,174 |
40 | Cloverfield Farms Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $208,603 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”