Production Flexibility Program in Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 18,467
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Virginia totaled $134,903,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agri-land | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $527,921 |
| 2 | Philip Minor Farms | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $522,332 |
| 3 | John N Mills & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $451,876 |
| 4 | Cohoke Farm LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $429,248 |
| 5 | Guy Newman | Virginia Beach, VA 23454 | $307,190 |
| 6 | Donald Horsley | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $303,072 |
| 7 | F T W & Sons | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $298,726 |
| 8 | Renwood Farm Inc | Charles City, VA 23030 | $296,676 |
| 9 | Virginia Beef Corporation | Haymarket, VA 20169 | $293,111 |
| 10 | J M Newcomb & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $292,994 |
| 11 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $284,036 |
| 12 | Battle Park Farm | Rapidan, VA 22733 | $282,854 |
| 13 | Bonney Bright Farms | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $280,441 |
| 14 | George H Alvis Jr & Sons | Manakin Sabot, VA 23103 | $273,477 |
| 15 | Engel Farms Inc | Hanover, VA 23069 | $264,116 |
| 16 | Brandon Plantation | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $263,903 |
| 17 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $263,082 |
| 18 | Robert R Morgan Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $258,206 |
| 19 | S E Thomas & Sons Lp | Caret, VA 22436 | $256,138 |
| 20 | H M Dudley Jr | Virginia Beach, VA 23457 | $251,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf