Farm Subsidy information
Caroline County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Caroline County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 296
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $55,616,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M S Terrell And Sons Inc | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $2,818,973 |
| 2 | Broaddus Farms | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $1,921,817 |
| 3 | Earl W Beazley | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $1,590,709 |
| 4 | Clayton Todd Beazley | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $1,383,786 |
| 5 | Smith Dairy Farm - Charity Hill Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $1,307,078 |
| 6 | B A Tignor Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $1,279,838 |
| 7 | Broaddus Farms Inc | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $1,157,621 |
| 8 | D S Terrell Inc | Hanover, VA 23069 | $1,045,848 |
| 9 | John F Davis | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $927,606 |
| 10 | Garland S Gravatt Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $883,893 |
| 11 | Stuart T Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $853,790 |
| 12 | Upshaw Farms | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $697,637 |
| 13 | Francis M Barlow Jr | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $667,541 |
| 14 | Douglas Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $652,385 |
| 15 | Mill Creek Farms LLC | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $608,100 |
| 16 | R F Upshaw Jr Farming Assoc Inc T | Milford, VA 22514 | $607,312 |
| 17 | James R Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $537,285 |
| 18 | Coleman Farm | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $515,819 |
| 19 | Kathy Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $513,814 |
| 20 | Newmarket Farm LLC | Milford, VA 22514 | $508,957 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf