Farm Subsidy information
Caroline County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Caroline County, Virginia, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 78
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $4,629,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Parrish Construction | Woodford, VA 22580 | $46,938 |
22 | Upshaw Farms Inc | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $44,151 |
23 | Kathy Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $43,620 |
24 | R F Upshaw Jr Farming Assoc Inc T | Milford, VA 22514 | $40,677 |
25 | John Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $39,933 |
26 | Curtis B Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $33,973 |
27 | C Dabney Allen Jr | Orange, VA 22960 | $31,827 |
28 | Mack A Wright Jr | Ladysmith, VA 22501 | $28,041 |
29 | Stover Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $27,547 |
30 | Mike Broaddus | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $27,009 |
31 | Lynwood D Broaddus | Milford, VA 22514 | $24,291 |
32 | Robert A Caruthers Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $23,763 |
33 | Brandon S Terrell | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $23,658 |
34 | Steve M Parrish Jr | Woodford, VA 22580 | $20,720 |
35 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $19,448 |
36 | Mt Olympus Berry Farm Inc | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $16,815 |
37 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $16,430 |
38 | H Hoge Smith | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $16,140 |
39 | Tates Family Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $13,585 |
40 | Donald S Penney | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $11,617 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”