Total Commodity Programs in Caroline County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 187
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $23,368,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Black Marsh Farm Inc | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $137,136 |
42 | Upshaw Farms Inc | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $135,930 |
43 | Robert A Caruthers Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $130,711 |
44 | Mack A Wright Jr | Ladysmith, VA 22501 | $124,276 |
45 | Michael Jaunsee Terrell | Montpelier, VA 23192 | $123,553 |
46 | Mattameade Farm | Woodford, VA 22580 | $123,488 |
47 | Newmarket Farm LLC | Milford, VA 22514 | $119,388 |
48 | James Edward Gouldman Jr | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $116,141 |
49 | Steve M Parrish Jr | Woodford, VA 22580 | $109,724 |
50 | Maxie Broaddus | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $97,482 |
51 | G H Roane And Sons Inc | Montross, VA 22520 | $91,866 |
52 | Mike Broaddus | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $90,148 |
53 | Brandon S Terrell | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $76,349 |
54 | Mt Gideon LLC | Ashland, VA 23005 | $76,272 |
55 | Stover Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $69,789 |
56 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $68,835 |
57 | C W Smith And Sons Inc | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $50,152 |
58 | Donald S Penney | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $41,747 |
59 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $38,550 |
60 | Tates Family Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $35,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”