Total Commodity Programs in Caroline County, Virginia, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Caroline County, Virginia totaled $2,358,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M S Terrell And Sons Inc | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $287,945 |
2 | Douglas Coleman Farms LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $182,018 |
3 | D S Terrell Inc | Hanover, VA 23069 | $162,823 |
4 | Mill Creek Farms LLC | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $161,447 |
5 | Earl W Beazley | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $113,372 |
6 | Newmarket Farm LLC | Milford, VA 22514 | $111,314 |
7 | Smith Dairy Farm - Charity Hill Farm LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $80,158 |
8 | B A Tignor Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $79,277 |
9 | Terrell Grain LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $74,489 |
10 | Douglas Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $67,037 |
11 | Francis M Barlow Jr | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $59,269 |
12 | Mt Gideon LLC | Ashland, VA 23005 | $56,772 |
13 | Edwin T Upshaw III And Sons Farm | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $55,226 |
14 | Clarence W Tignor Jr Farms Inc | Milford, VA 22514 | $54,690 |
15 | Wayne Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $53,954 |
16 | Cory D Garrett | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $51,273 |
17 | Stuart T Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $43,761 |
18 | Kathy Lane | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $43,620 |
19 | Garland S Gravatt Jr | Milford, VA 22514 | $42,945 |
20 | Coleman Farm, LLC | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $41,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>