Farm Subsidy information
King and Queen County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in King and Queen County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 75
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $2,435,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $149,084 |
| 2 | Beaver Dam Farm Inc | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $119,662 |
| 3 | Franklin Parker III | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $117,397 |
| 4 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $108,778 |
| 5 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $67,259 |
| 6 | Richard M Schools Jr | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $55,896 |
| 7 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $53,799 |
| 8 | James M. Gibson Trucking LLC | Kingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085 | $52,875 |
| 9 | Mike Gibson & Sons Logging Inc | Kingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085 | $52,875 |
| 10 | Tyler Seal Logging | Newtown, VA 23126 | $52,875 |
| 11 | C. W. Brown Logging, Inc. | St Stephens Church, VA 23148 | $52,875 |
| 12 | Bristow Logging Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $50,875 |
| 13 | C. W. Brown Trucking, LLC | St Stephens Church, VA 23148 | $33,402 |
| 14 | Kevin M Schools | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $33,383 |
| 15 | Hillsborough Farm Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $30,059 |
| 16 | Plainview Farm Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $28,264 |
| 17 | Hrf, Inc | Walkerton, VA 23177 | $24,215 |
| 18 | William Davis Carlton | Little Plymouth, VA 23091 | $18,980 |
| 19 | Deere Haven Farms Inc | Shacklefords, VA 23156 | $18,054 |
| 20 | Robert P Longest | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $15,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf