Total Disaster Programs in King and Queen County, Virginia, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 96

Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in King and Queen County, Virginia totaled $3,752,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Disaster Programs
1995-2021
1Philip Minor FarmsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$403,849
2James M Fogg Farms IncSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$384,947
3C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, DunkSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$208,315
4J & D Carlton Farms IncMattaponi, VA 23110$195,604
5Richard M Schools JrSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$176,841
6Plainview Farm IncShacklefords, VA 23156$172,789
7Beaver Dam Farm IncLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$160,145
8Thomas O Longest JrKing Queen Ch, VA 23085$152,247
9Kevin M SchoolsSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$132,243
10John R CarltonMattaponi, VA 23110$104,044
11Robert P LongestSaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$97,036
12Philip Minor Farms IISaint Stephens Churc, VA 23148$94,733
13Beaver Dam FarmLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$86,255
14William Davis CarltonLittle Plymouth, VA 23091$82,889
15Hillsborough Farm IncWalkerton, VA 23177$81,545
16Tazewell FarmNewtown, VA 23126$74,210
17Hrf, IncWalkerton, VA 23177$53,736
18James M. Gibson Trucking LLCKingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085$52,875
19Mike Gibson & Sons Logging IncKingqueen Court Hous, VA 23085$52,875
20Tyler Seal LoggingNewtown, VA 23126$52,875

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag